Information Roundup

Picture from

2nd Circuit says gents’s membership not eligible for PPP loans

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals at New York has dominated {that a} Buffalo-area gents’s membership in New York will not be eligible for the Paycheck Safety Program underneath an exclusion for companies providing “stay performances of a prurient sexual nature.” Pharaohs GC Inc. had claimed that the exclusion amounted to content material discrimination in violation of its constitutional rights. (Law360)

Lawyer pleads not responsible in scheme to embezzle financial institution funds

Chicago lawyer Robert M. Kowalski has pleaded not responsible to accusations that he conspired with different defendants to embezzle not less than $31 million from a financial institution earlier than it closed. Kowalski, 58, is accused of receiving cash from the Washington Federal Financial institution for Financial savings in loans that have been by no means correctly documented or repaid. He was a buddy of the financial institution president, who has since died. Kowalski is representing himself within the case. (Law360, the Chicago Sun-Times, the third superseding indictment)

Sanctions in opposition to environmental lawyer to be recalculated

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals at New York has ordered a court docket to recalculate $4.1 million in sanctions imposed in opposition to a lawyer for violating an injunction after he was discovered to have fraudulently obtained a $9.5 billion judgment in opposition to Chevron in Ecuador. U.S. District Decide Lewis Kaplan of the Southern District of New York had ordered lawyer Steven Donziger to pay $3.43 million in attorney fees and $666,476 in sanctions for violating an injunction that barred him from taking advantage of the Ecuador judgment or making an attempt to implement it in the USA. Kaplan stated Donziger had violated the injunction by promoting pursuits within the Ecuadorian judgment to 6 buyers. In its opinion Thursday, the appeals court docket stated a later order by Kaplan had made the injunction unclear, and it wasn’t unreasonable for Donziger to assume he may monetize the judgment. (Thomson Reuters Legal, Law360)